Fan of the first one (to some degree), but hated this one. It didn't help that my wife was bashing it the entire time we watched it. Even my kids thought it was dullsville. I give it a 22. I had to put it lower than your score for "Unknown", which I liked.
22?!? It does sound like your co-audience didn't do you many favors. I think it helps that I had it in HD on a big TV. The whole idea of this movie was to see it in 3-D on an I-MAX. I couldn't make that happen, unfortunately. The plot is relatively worthless (though the first one suffers under scrutiny as well). I admit, however, that I was rather kind to overlook the flaws a bit.
Unknown was 70% of a good movie, but the 30% was so craven, so insulting to the audience that it completely ruined the movie for me. Here's a review that summed up my feelings very well.
A Game for the Generations
-
My dad had been a Chicago Bears Season ticket holder in the 1960s, before
moving to the suburbs, having kids, and all of that.
We watched the Bears togeth...
Two Decades On
-
Today marks 20 years since I joined Nielsen! Because of the location
(Schaumburg, IL), I assumed my time with the company only last two years at
most. Thr...
2 comments:
Fan of the first one (to some degree), but hated this one. It didn't help that my wife was bashing it the entire time we watched it. Even my kids thought it was dullsville. I give it a 22. I had to put it lower than your score for "Unknown", which I liked.
22?!? It does sound like your co-audience didn't do you many favors. I think it helps that I had it in HD on a big TV. The whole idea of this movie was to see it in 3-D on an I-MAX. I couldn't make that happen, unfortunately. The plot is relatively worthless (though the first one suffers under scrutiny as well). I admit, however, that I was rather kind to overlook the flaws a bit.
Unknown was 70% of a good movie, but the 30% was so craven, so insulting to the audience that it completely ruined the movie for me. Here's a review that summed up my feelings very well.
Post a Comment