One Word Review: I Love You Man
63: Rushed
Posts
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Marching Orders
My Other Blogs
-
In Memoriam : Walter W. Reed - I have made only a few mentions of my father in this and my other blogs. Though if you look at many of the postings, you will see his comments spread acr...
-
Road Games College Pick 'Em (aka Big Ten Den) - We're just a few weeks away from kickoff, and that means a reprise of the annual tradition of Pick 'Em. Pick the winning teams across 20 games or so each ...
Contact Me
E-mail me at: anreed (at) gmail (dot) com
"Best Of"
Other Music
Other Movies
Labels
- one word reviews (331)
- music (127)
- movies (87)
- unyielding commissioning (76)
- youtube (63)
- Top 50 albums of the 2000s (40)
- rawk reviews (40)
- lists (29)
- a to b back and forth (23)
- lollapalooza (23)
- first blush (21)
- schwarzenegger sunday (20)
- Five for Tuesday (17)
- roger ebert (17)
- touch me i'm sick (15)
- politics (14)
- here be tygers (13)
- the onion (10)
- oscars (8)
- pitchfork festival (8)
- heard these guys yet (7)
- scene stealers (7)
- 90s alternative (5)
- kaelin awards (5)
- kill your television (5)
- most worthless person of the year (5)
- daily show ten years ago (4)
- in defense of (3)
- mort and stephen (3)
- sport (3)
- hidden gems (2)
- meta (2)
- top hidden gem movies (2)
- top ten cougars (2)
- hidden under covers (1)
- oeuvre (1)
- smart science fiction (1)
- songs for your last day of work (1)
- ticketmaster sucks (1)
- top chick flicks (1)
2 comments:
I get that they were into the band Rush, but how does Rushed describe this enjoyable comedy?
I realize that this review is probably the most vague OWR to date, which is quite the strong statement. Clearly the pun was too good to pass up. However, I also find the description apt for this film, though I am making some assumptions about its flaws. First of all, I certainly agree that it was enjoyable. Everyone should remember that a 63 is still a positive review, though only just. There were some truly hilarious one-liners and gags in this movie. The supporting cast generally delivered, especially Tom Lennon and Jon Favreau.
But many aspects of this picture just seemed hastily thrown together or improved to the point of dullness. I think the line "slappin de bayass" was uttered no less than 15 times. It wasn't funny the first time, and appeared that it was overly milked because they were short on material. I was thoroughly uninterested in the Paul Rudd character, and of all his subpar performances, this was the most flat to me. The whole plot is paint-by-numbers, and the fiancee was simply a caricature of the perfect woman for any guy. As a vehicle for jokes, the movie worked. I definitely enjoyed the film, but I don't really have any interest in seeing it again. There's no real story here, but I laughed anyway. I don't know how much time and effort they put into it, but to me it seemed more like and SNL sketch with a lot of laughs, but little substance. Compared to the other movies from the Apatow gang (note - Apatow was not involved this time), this one felt small and quick.
Thanks for asking, Kozy. I was hoping someone would call me out on it so I could give an explanation.
Post a Comment